| In reinforced concrete construction, the
combination of concrete and steel provides the three most
important properties for earthquake resistance: stiffness,
strength, and ductility.
Why Buildings Survive
Scientists study damage from earthquakes to
determine what types of buildings best withstand seismic forces.
Modern earthquake-resistant design relies on several studies
including:
| Year |
Earthquake |
Magnitude |
Studies |
|
1989 |
Loma Prieta |
7.1 |
Univ. of Calif., Berkeley |
|
1994 |
Northridge |
6.8 |
NAHB Research Center/ National
Institute of Standards and Technology |
|
2000 |
Yountville/Napa |
5.2 |
Stanford Univ. |
Studies of earthquake damage consistently show
well-anchored shear walls are the key to earthquake resistance
in low-rise buildings.
Optimal design conditions include shear walls
that extend the entire height and located on all four sides of a
building. Long walls are stronger than short walls, and solid
walls are better than ones with a lot of opening for windows and
doors. These elements are designed to survive severe sideways
(in-plane) forces, called racking and shear, without being
damaged or bent far out of position. Shear walls also must be
well anchored to the foundation structure to work effectively.
Properly installed steel reinforcing bars extend across the
joint between the walls and the foundation to provide secure
anchorage to the foundation.
Why Buildings Fail
Low-rise buildings most vulnerable to
earthquakes do have the necessary stiffness, strength, and
ductility to resist the forces of an earthquake or had walls
that were not well anchored to a solid foundation, or both.
Three types of buildings sustained the most significant damage:
 |
Multi-story buildings
with a ground floor consisting only of columns:
Most of these buildings were 3 to 4 stories tall
with a parking garage or a living area with many
large windows on the ground level. The columns may
have been strong enough to hold up the structure,
but did not provide an adequate amount of racking
resistance during a seismic event. When the
earthquake shook the building side-to-side, the
upper stories sometimes tipped over to one side.
Whether built of wood, steel, or concrete—they all
suffered damage. |
| |
|
Wood-frame houses
with weak connections between the walls
and foundation:
Wood-framed buildings are inherently
ductile (flexible), which is an
attribute during an earthquake. However,
the shaking sent some of these houses
sliding to one side. Frequently, the
shear walls were strong enough, but the
connection to the foundation was a weak
point that gave way.
|
 |
Un-reinforced masonry or concrete
buildings:
Masonry or concrete walls
not reinforced with steel bars were not
ductile enough to be effective shear
walls. And if there is no steel
connecting them to their foundation, the
joint between walls and foundation can
be a weak point.
|
|
|
Why
reinforced concrete is safe
Reinforced concrete walls are a composite system: Concrete
resists compression forces, and reinforcing steel resists
tensile forces produced by an earthquake.
The concrete is cast around the bars, locking
them into place. The exceptional ductility of the steel to
resist tensile forces, coupled with the rock-like ability of
concrete to resist compression, results in an excellent
combination of the three most important earthquake resistance
properties: stiffness, strength, and ductility. A study at
Construction Technology Laboratories revealed that even a
lightly reinforced concrete shear wall has over six times the
racking load resistance as framed wall construction.
It’s no wonder that modern reinforced concrete buildings were
found to survive these recent earthquakes with rarely any
significant damage.
|